linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: ufs: Cleanup completed request without interrupt notification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1597236472.26065.9.camel@mtkswgap22>
Date:   Wed, 12 Aug 2020 20:47:52 +0800
From:   Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
To:     Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>, <avri.altman@....com>
CC:     <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, <avri.altman@....com>,
        <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>, <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        <bvanassche@....org>, <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
        <cang@...eaurora.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: ufs: Cleanup completed request without
 interrupt notification

Hi Avri, Bean,

On Tue, 2020-08-11 at 16:18 +0200, Bean Huo wrote:
> From: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
> 
> If somehow no interrupt notification is raised for a completed request
> and its doorbell bit is cleared by host, UFS driver needs to cleanup
> its outstanding bit in ufshcd_abort(). Otherwise, system may behave
> abnormally by below flow:
> 
> After ufshcd_abort() returns, this request will be requeued by SCSI
> layer with its outstanding bit set. Any future completed request
> will trigger ufshcd_transfer_req_compl() to handle all "completed
> outstanding bits". In this time, the "abnormal outstanding bit"
> will be detected and the "requeued request" will be chosen to execute
> request post-processing flow. This is wrong because this request is
> still "alive".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>

Thanks Bean's patch integration.

Like Avri's comment in https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11683381/
I think you could add Acked-by tag from Avri.



Hi Avri,

Please correct above description if required.
Thanks for your review! : )


Thanks,

Stanley Chu

> ---
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index 307622284239..66fe814c8725 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -6492,7 +6492,7 @@ static int ufshcd_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
>  			/* command completed already */
>  			dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: cmd at tag %d successfully cleared from DB.\n",
>  				__func__, tag);
> -			goto out;
> +			goto cleanup;
>  		} else {
>  			dev_err(hba->dev,
>  				"%s: no response from device. tag = %d, err %d\n",
> @@ -6526,6 +6526,7 @@ static int ufshcd_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> +cleanup:
>  	scsi_dma_unmap(cmd);
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(host->host_lock, flags);