linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] opp: Allow dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to return -EPROBE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200812150122.dennzvxfzk4fyxm2@vireshk-mac-ubuntu>
Date:   Wed, 12 Aug 2020 20:31:22 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
Cc:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>,
        Niklas Cassel <nks@...wful.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] opp: Allow dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to return
 -EPROBE_DEFER

On 12-08-20, 12:53, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:10:38AM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > I wasn't sure if the changes in drivers/base/power/domain.c
> > > should be made in a separate commit, but they need to be made together
> > > with the other changes.
> > 
> > I would suggest to move the changes in drivers/base/power/domain.c
> > into a separate patch, still part of the series, but let it preceed
> > $subject patch.
> > 
> 
> OK, will do that in v2 - thank you!
> 
> I have another small build fix reported by the kernel test robot,
> but will wait with sending that out until Viresh had a chance to give
> some feedback on the basic idea. :)

What was the issue that was reported ? I may end up applying V1 only
with some of my changes.

-- 
viresh