linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] ASoC: Intel: Add period size constraint on strago board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0714b222-d3fc-5744-1147-bfac7df2651e@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:38:22 -0500
From:   Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Lu, Brent" <brent.lu@...el.com>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc:     Yu-Hsuan Hsu <yuhsuan@...omium.org>,
        Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski@...ux.intel.com>,
        "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
        Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rojewski, Cezary" <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
        Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sam McNally <sammc@...omium.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Daniel Stuart <daniel.stuart14@...il.com>,
        "yuhsuan@...gle.com" <yuhsuan@...gle.com>,
        Damian van Soelen <dj.vsoelen@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] ASoC: Intel: Add period size constraint on strago
 board



On 8/12/20 11:08 AM, Lu, Brent wrote:
>>>
>>> I also wonder what's really missing, too :)
>>>
>>> BTW, I took a look back at the thread, and CRAS seems using a very
>>> large buffer, namely:
>>> [   52.434791] sound pcmC1D0p:   PERIOD_SIZE [240:240]
>>> [   52.434802] sound pcmC1D0p:   BUFFER_SIZE [204480:204480]
>>
>> yes, that's 852 periods and 4.260 seconds. Never seen such values :-)
> 
> CRAS calls snd_pcm_hw_params_set_buffer_size_max() to use as large
> buffer as possible. So the period size is an arbitrary number in different
> platforms. Atom SST platform happens to be 256, and CML SOF platform
> is 1056 for example.

ok, but earlier in this thread it was mentioned that values such as 432 
are not suitable. the statement above seems to mean the period actual 
value is a "don't care", so I don't quite see why this specific patch2 
restricting the value to 240 is necessary. Patch1 is needed for sure, 
Patch2 is where Takashi and I are not convinced.