[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bljdl7o4.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 14:43:23 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
LinusW <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list\:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>,
Srinivas Rao L <lsrao@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] genirq: Introduce irq_suspend_one() and irq_resume_one() callbacks
Doug,
On Thu, Aug 13 2020 at 20:04, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 7:07 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>> Having a quick and dirty POC for illustration is fine and usually
>> useful.
>
> OK, I will try to remember that, in the future, I should send
> questions rather than patches to you. I'm always learning the
The quick and dirty POC patch for illustration along with the questions
is always good to catch my attention.
> workflows of the different maintainers, so sorry for killing so much
> time. :(
No problem.
>> If it solves the problem and from what you explained it should do so
>> then this is definitely the right way to go.
>
> Wonderful! Looking forward to Maulik's post doing it this way.
/me closes the case for now and moves on.
Thanks
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists