| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAPx_LQGQx8eaT2V8iGwUE1ptKtmRZ9VZz5Oa0Bybv2+whteKGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 23:32:35 +0800
From: qianli zhao <zhaoqianligood@...il.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: Felix.Kuehling@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk, bfields@...hat.com, cl@...k-chips.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhaoqianli@...omi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kthread: add objectdebug support
Hi,Stephen
Thanks for your suggestion, i will improve my patch.
Thanks.
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 4:18 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Quoting Qianli Zhao (2020-08-13 02:55:16)
> > From: Qianli Zhao <zhaoqianli@...omi.com>
> >
> > Add debugobject support to track the life time of kthread_work
>
> Subject says 'objectdebug' but then this says debugobject. Use
> debugobject throughout please.
>
> > which is used to detect reinitialization/free active object problems
>
> which is used to detect reinitialization/free active object problems.
>
> > Add kthread_init_work_onstack/kthread_init_delayed_work_onstack for
> > kthread onstack support
>
> kthread onstack support.
>
> Also, mark functions with parenthesis please.
>
> >
> > If we reinitialize a kthread_work that has been activated,
> > this will cause delayed_work_list/work_list corruption.
> > enable this config,there is an chance to fixup these errors
>
> Capitalize enable.
>
> > or WARNING the wrong use of kthread_work
> >
> > [30858.395766] list_del corruption. next->prev should be ffffffe388ebbf88, but was ffffffe388ebb588
> > [30858.395788] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 387 at /home/work/data/codes/build_home/kernel/msm-4.19/lib/list_debug.c:56 __list_del_entry_valid+0xc8/0xd0
> > ...
> > [30858.405951] list_add corruption. next->prev should be prev (ffffffe389392620), but was ffffffe388ebbf88. (next=ffffffe388ebbf88).
> > [30858.405977] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 7721 at /home/work/data/codes/build_home/kernel/msm-4.19/lib/list_debug.c:25 __list_add_valid+0x7c/0xc8
> >
> > crash> struct kthread_worker.delayed_work_list 0xffffffe3893925f0
> > [ffffffe389392620] delayed_work_list = {
> > next = 0xffffffe388ebbf88,
> > prev = 0xffffffe388ebb588
> > }
> > crash> list 0xffffffe388ebbf88
> > ffffffe388ebbf88
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Qianli Zhao <zhaoqianli@...omi.com>
> [...]
> > diff --git a/include/linux/poison.h b/include/linux/poison.h
> > index df34330..2e6a370 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/poison.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/poison.h
> > @@ -86,4 +86,7 @@
> > /********** security/ **********/
> > #define KEY_DESTROY 0xbd
> >
> > +/********** kernel/kthread **********/
> > +#define KWORK_ENTRY_STATIC ((void *) 0x600 + POISON_POINTER_DELTA)
>
> Can we get a comment above this like there is for TIMER_ENTRY_STATIC?
>
> > +
> > #endif
> > diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c
> > index 132f84a..68a16cc 100644
> > --- a/kernel/kthread.c
> > +++ b/kernel/kthread.c
> > @@ -67,6 +67,118 @@ enum KTHREAD_BITS {
> > KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK,
> > };
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_KTHREAD_WORK
> > +static struct debug_obj_descr kwork_debug_descr;
> > +
> > +static void *kwork_debug_hint(void *addr)
> > +{
> > + return ((struct kthread_work *) addr)->func;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool kwork_is_static_object(void *addr)
> > +{
> > + struct kthread_work *kwork = addr;
> > +
> > + return (kwork->node.prev == NULL &&
> > + kwork->node.next == KWORK_ENTRY_STATIC);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool kwork_fixup_init(void *addr, enum debug_obj_state state)
> > +{
> > + struct kthread_work *kwork = addr;
> > +
> > + switch (state) {
> > + case ODEBUG_STATE_ACTIVE:
> > + kthread_cancel_work_sync(kwork);
> > + debug_object_init(kwork, &kwork_debug_descr);
> > + return true;
> > + default:
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool kwork_fixup_free(void *addr, enum debug_obj_state state)
> > +{
> > + struct kthread_work *kwork = addr;
> > +
> > + switch (state) {
> > + case ODEBUG_STATE_ACTIVE:
> > + kthread_cancel_work_sync(kwork);
> > + debug_object_free(kwork, &kwork_debug_descr);
> > + return true;
> > + default:
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void stub_kthread_work(struct kthread_work *unuse)
> > +{
> > + WARN_ON(1);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool kwork_fixup_assert_init(void *addr, enum debug_obj_state state)
> > +{
> > + struct kthread_work *kwork = addr;
> > + switch (state) {
> > + case ODEBUG_STATE_NOTAVAILABLE:
> > + kthread_init_work(kwork, stub_kthread_work);
> > + return true;
> > + default:
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct debug_obj_descr kwork_debug_descr = {
> > + .name = "kthread_work",
> > + .debug_hint = kwork_debug_hint,
> > + .is_static_object = kwork_is_static_object,
> > + .fixup_init = kwork_fixup_init,
> > + .fixup_free = kwork_fixup_free,
> > + .fixup_assert_init = kwork_fixup_assert_init,
>
> Nitpick: This needs some formatting to deindent one tab and align the
> equals signs.
>
> > +};
> > +
> > +static inline void debug_kwork_activate(struct kthread_work *kwork)
> > +{
> > + debug_object_activate(kwork, &kwork_debug_descr);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void debug_kwork_deactivate(struct kthread_work *kwork)
> > +{
> > + debug_object_deactivate(kwork, &kwork_debug_descr);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void debug_kwork_assert_init(struct kthread_work *kwork)
> > +{
> > + debug_object_assert_init(kwork, &kwork_debug_descr);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void __init_kwork(struct kthread_work *kwork, int onstack)
> > +{
> > + if (onstack)
> > + debug_object_init_on_stack(kwork, &kwork_debug_descr);
> > + else
> > + debug_object_init(kwork, &kwork_debug_descr);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__init_kwork);
> > +
> > +void destroy_kwork_on_stack(struct kthread_work *kwork)
> > +{
> > + debug_object_free(kwork, &kwork_debug_descr);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(destroy_kwork_on_stack);
> > +
> > +void destroy_delayed_kwork_on_stack(struct kthread_delayed_work *kdwork)
> > +{
> > + destroy_timer_on_stack(&kdwork->timer);
> > + debug_object_free(&kdwork->work, &kwork_debug_descr);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(destroy_delayed_kwork_on_stack);
> > +#else
> > +static inline void debug_kwork_activate(struct kthread_work *kwork) { }
> > +static inline void debug_kwork_deactivate(struct kthread_work *kwork) { }
> > +static inline void debug_kwork_assert_init(struct kthread_work *kwork) { }
> > +#endif
> > +
> > static inline void set_kthread_struct(void *kthread)
> > {
> > /*
> > @@ -697,6 +809,7 @@ int kthread_worker_fn(void *worker_ptr)
> > if (!list_empty(&worker->work_list)) {
> > work = list_first_entry(&worker->work_list,
> > struct kthread_work, node);
> > + debug_kwork_deactivate(work);
> > list_del_init(&work->node);
> > }
> > worker->current_work = work;
> > @@ -833,8 +946,10 @@ static void kthread_insert_work(struct kthread_worker *worker,
> > {
> > kthread_insert_work_sanity_check(worker, work);
> >
> > + debug_kwork_activate(work);
> > list_add_tail(&work->node, pos);
> > work->worker = worker;
> > +
>
> Drop this newline.
>
> > if (!worker->current_work && likely(worker->task))
> > wake_up_process(worker->task);
> > }
> > @@ -857,6 +972,7 @@ bool kthread_queue_work(struct kthread_worker *worker,
> > bool ret = false;
> > unsigned long flags;
> >
> > + debug_kwork_assert_init(work);
> > raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&worker->lock, flags);
> > if (!queuing_blocked(worker, work)) {
> > kthread_insert_work(worker, work, &worker->work_list);
> > @@ -895,6 +1011,7 @@ void kthread_delayed_work_timer_fn(struct timer_list *t)
> >
> > /* Move the work from worker->delayed_work_list. */
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(list_empty(&work->node));
> > + debug_kwork_deactivate(work);
> > list_del_init(&work->node);
> > kthread_insert_work(worker, work, &worker->work_list);
> >
> > @@ -924,7 +1041,7 @@ static void __kthread_queue_delayed_work(struct kthread_worker *worker,
> >
> > /* Be paranoid and try to detect possible races already now. */
> > kthread_insert_work_sanity_check(worker, work);
> > -
> > + debug_kwork_activate(work);
> > list_add(&work->node, &worker->delayed_work_list);
> > work->worker = worker;
> > timer->expires = jiffies + delay;
> > @@ -954,6 +1071,7 @@ bool kthread_queue_delayed_work(struct kthread_worker *worker,
> > unsigned long flags;
> > bool ret = false;
> >
> > + debug_kwork_assert_init(work);
> > raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&worker->lock, flags);
> >
> > if (!queuing_blocked(worker, work)) {
> > @@ -987,15 +1105,16 @@ static void kthread_flush_work_fn(struct kthread_work *work)
> > void kthread_flush_work(struct kthread_work *work)
> > {
> > struct kthread_flush_work fwork = {
> > - KTHREAD_WORK_INIT(fwork.work, kthread_flush_work_fn),
> > - COMPLETION_INITIALIZER_ONSTACK(fwork.done),
> > + .done = COMPLETION_INITIALIZER_ONSTACK(fwork.done),
> > };
> > struct kthread_worker *worker;
> > bool noop = false;
> >
> > + kthread_init_work_onstack(&fwork.work, kthread_flush_work_fn);
> > + debug_kwork_assert_init(work);
> > worker = work->worker;
> > if (!worker)
> > - return;
> > + goto out;
>
> Why make the worker and init it on the stack if there isn't anything to
> do? The !worker check should be early and then bail out before doing
> anything else.
>
> >
> > raw_spin_lock_irq(&worker->lock);
> > /* Work must not be used with >1 worker, see kthread_queue_work(). */
> > @@ -1013,6 +1132,9 @@ void kthread_flush_work(struct kthread_work *work)
> >
> > if (!noop)
> > wait_for_completion(&fwork.done);
> > +
> > +out:
>
> Then this label can be dropped.
>
> > + destroy_kwork_on_stack(&fwork.work);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kthread_flush_work);
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists