[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200816163521.GF1486171@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 09:35:21 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
pc@...ibm.com, jolsa@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org,
yao.jin@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, irogers@...gle.com,
maddy@...ux.ibm.com, ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com,
anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
nasastry@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] perf jevents: Add support for parsing
perchip/percore events
> @@ -321,7 +331,7 @@ static void print_events_table_prefix(FILE *fp, const char *tblname)
> static int print_events_table_entry(void *data, char *name, char *event,
> char *desc, char *long_desc,
> char *pmu, char *unit, char *perpkg,
> - char *metric_expr,
> + char *metric_expr, char *aggr_mode,
> char *metric_name, char *metric_group,
> char *deprecated, char *metric_constraint)
We should really define a struct now to pass the parameters,
the callback prototype is getting ridiculous.
I know it's my fault originally, but sorry you probably have to do it
because you are touching it last.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists