linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 022/168] ARM: at91: pm: add missing put_device() call in at91_pm_sram

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200817143734.833263110@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:15:53 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, yu kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 022/168] ARM: at91: pm: add missing put_device() call in at91_pm_sram_init()

From: yu kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>

[ Upstream commit f87a4f022c44e5b87e842a9f3e644fba87e8385f ]

if of_find_device_by_node() succeed, at91_pm_sram_init() doesn't have
a corresponding put_device(). Thus add a jump target to fix the exception
handling for this function implementation.

Fixes: d2e467905596 ("ARM: at91: pm: use the mmio-sram pool to access SRAM")
Signed-off-by: yu kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200604123301.3905837-1-yukuai3@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c | 11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
index e2e4df3d11e53..21bfe9b6e16a1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
@@ -542,13 +542,13 @@ static void __init at91_pm_sram_init(void)
 	sram_pool = gen_pool_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
 	if (!sram_pool) {
 		pr_warn("%s: sram pool unavailable!\n", __func__);
-		return;
+		goto out_put_device;
 	}
 
 	sram_base = gen_pool_alloc(sram_pool, at91_pm_suspend_in_sram_sz);
 	if (!sram_base) {
 		pr_warn("%s: unable to alloc sram!\n", __func__);
-		return;
+		goto out_put_device;
 	}
 
 	sram_pbase = gen_pool_virt_to_phys(sram_pool, sram_base);
@@ -556,12 +556,17 @@ static void __init at91_pm_sram_init(void)
 					at91_pm_suspend_in_sram_sz, false);
 	if (!at91_suspend_sram_fn) {
 		pr_warn("SRAM: Could not map\n");
-		return;
+		goto out_put_device;
 	}
 
 	/* Copy the pm suspend handler to SRAM */
 	at91_suspend_sram_fn = fncpy(at91_suspend_sram_fn,
 			&at91_pm_suspend_in_sram, at91_pm_suspend_in_sram_sz);
+	return;
+
+out_put_device:
+	put_device(&pdev->dev);
+	return;
 }
 
 static bool __init at91_is_pm_mode_active(int pm_mode)
-- 
2.25.1