linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 023/168] spi: lantiq: fix: Rx overflow error in full duplex mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200817143734.881911918@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:15:54 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Dilip Kota <eswara.kota@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 023/168] spi: lantiq: fix: Rx overflow error in full duplex mode

From: Dilip Kota <eswara.kota@...ux.intel.com>

[ Upstream commit 661ccf2b3f1360be50242726f7c26ced6a9e7d52 ]

In full duplex mode, rx overflow error is observed. To overcome the error,
wait until the complete data got received and proceed further.

Fixes: 17f84b793c01 ("spi: lantiq-ssc: add support for Lantiq SSC SPI controller")
Signed-off-by: Dilip Kota <eswara.kota@...ux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/efb650b0faa49a00788c4e0ca8ef7196bdba851d.1594957019.git.eswara.kota@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-lantiq-ssc.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-lantiq-ssc.c b/drivers/spi/spi-lantiq-ssc.c
index d5976615d924b..dc740b5f720ba 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-lantiq-ssc.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-lantiq-ssc.c
@@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ struct lantiq_ssc_spi {
 	unsigned int			tx_fifo_size;
 	unsigned int			rx_fifo_size;
 	unsigned int			base_cs;
+	unsigned int			fdx_tx_level;
 };
 
 static u32 lantiq_ssc_readl(const struct lantiq_ssc_spi *spi, u32 reg)
@@ -484,6 +485,7 @@ static void tx_fifo_write(struct lantiq_ssc_spi *spi)
 	u32 data;
 	unsigned int tx_free = tx_fifo_free(spi);
 
+	spi->fdx_tx_level = 0;
 	while (spi->tx_todo && tx_free) {
 		switch (spi->bits_per_word) {
 		case 2 ... 8:
@@ -512,6 +514,7 @@ static void tx_fifo_write(struct lantiq_ssc_spi *spi)
 
 		lantiq_ssc_writel(spi, data, LTQ_SPI_TB);
 		tx_free--;
+		spi->fdx_tx_level++;
 	}
 }
 
@@ -523,6 +526,13 @@ static void rx_fifo_read_full_duplex(struct lantiq_ssc_spi *spi)
 	u32 data;
 	unsigned int rx_fill = rx_fifo_level(spi);
 
+	/*
+	 * Wait until all expected data to be shifted in.
+	 * Otherwise, rx overrun may occur.
+	 */
+	while (rx_fill != spi->fdx_tx_level)
+		rx_fill = rx_fifo_level(spi);
+
 	while (rx_fill) {
 		data = lantiq_ssc_readl(spi, LTQ_SPI_RB);
 
-- 
2.25.1