[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e64e363a-55e5-7a71-ced7-fd28fc32aaa8@kernel.dk>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 20:09:06 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Xu Wang <vulab@...as.ac.cn>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: ahci: use ata_link_info() instead of
ata_link_printk()
On 8/16/20 6:18 PM, Xu Wang wrote:
> Using ata_link_info() instead of ata_link_printk().
>
> Signed-off-by: Xu Wang <vulab@...as.ac.cn>
> ---
> drivers/ata/ahci.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> index 0c0a736eb861..9d72d907b4ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> @@ -807,7 +807,7 @@ static int ahci_avn_hardreset(struct ata_link *link, unsigned int *class,
> (sstatus & 0xf) != 1)
> break;
>
> - ata_link_printk(link, KERN_INFO, "avn bounce port%d\n",
> + ata_link_info(link, "avn bounce port%d\n",
> port);
Why not collapse that into one line as well when making that change, as
it now fits just fine?
Apart from that, looks fine to me.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists