[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <012eee35-6835-7244-0013-9fc6980107e0@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 12:12:21 +0200
From: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, TY Chang <tychang@...ltek.com>
Cc: linux-realtek-soc@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: realtek: Add Realtek DHC SoC
rtd1295
Am 17.08.20 um 22:33 schrieb Rob Herring:
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:49:04 +0800, TY Chang wrote:
>> Add device tree binding Documentation for rtd1295
>> pinctrl driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: TY Chang <tychang@...ltek.com>
>> ---
>> .../pinctrl/realtek,rtd1295-pinctrl.yaml | 192 ++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 192 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/realtek,rtd1295-pinctrl.yaml
>>
>
>
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
>
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
The thing really missing here is a per-patch change log.
Things were added here that I'm sure you would not give your Reviewed-by
for, in particular new properties prefixed with unregistered rtk prefix
instead of the registered realtek prefix.
@TY, hiding such changes in a big previously reviewed patch without any
mention is problematic - please rather do smaller follow-up patches to
not invalidate previous reviews with new features.
Thanks,
Andreas
--
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists