[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5f6355d6af724dc6b2e113e567e4ec5f@realtek.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 03:12:22 +0000
From: TY_Chang[張子逸] <tychang@...ltek.com>
To: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-realtek-soc@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-realtek-soc@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 5/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: realtek: Add Realtek DHC SoC rtd1295
Hi Rob, Andreas,
Thanks for the review.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 6:12 PM
> To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>; TY_Chang[張子逸]
> <tychang@...ltek.com>
> Cc: linux-realtek-soc@...ts.infradead.org; linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org;
> devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; robh+dt@...nel.org;
> linus.walleij@...aro.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: realtek: Add Realtek DHC SoC
> rtd1295
>
> Am 17.08.20 um 22:33 schrieb Rob Herring:
> > On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:49:04 +0800, TY Chang wrote:
> >> Add device tree binding Documentation for rtd1295 pinctrl driver.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: TY Chang <tychang@...ltek.com>
> >> ---
> >> .../pinctrl/realtek,rtd1295-pinctrl.yaml | 192 ++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 192 insertions(+)
> >> create mode 100644
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/realtek,rtd1295-pinctrl.yam
> >> l
> >>
> >
> >
> > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions.
> > However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The
> > upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> >
> > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>
> The thing really missing here is a per-patch change log.
>
> Things were added here that I'm sure you would not give your Reviewed-by for,
> in particular new properties prefixed with unregistered rtk prefix instead of the
> registered realtek prefix.
I will modify the property name with realtek prefix in patch v4.
>
> @TY, hiding such changes in a big previously reviewed patch without any
> mention is problematic - please rather do smaller follow-up patches to not
> invalidate previous reviews with new features.
>
I'm sorry about that. I will add Reviewed-by tags in the previously reviewed patch and add follow-up patches for new features in patch v4.
Best Regards,
TYChang
> ------Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists