[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB3642F2053B86CD4FE10383E1975C0@DM6PR11MB3642.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 14:49:50 +0000
From: "Lu, Brent" <brent.lu@...el.com>
To: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Amadeusz Sławiński
<amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] ASoC: hdac_hdmi: support 'ELD' mixer
>
> This is a bit iffy part. If same PCM is connected to multiple receivers, you
> return ELD data for the first one and ignore the rest. OTOH, this is inline with
> comment in hdac_hdmi_get_port_from_cvt() in that this pcm-to-many
> routing is not really supported by the driver now. But jack status reporting is
> done a port basis, not per PCM/CVTs, so this is not fully aligned.
>
> Hmm. Given the proposed patch is aligned with the user-space interface
> exposed by patch_hdmi.c, I'm ok to go with this. Can you add an explicit
> comment to explain what is happening above?
>
> Br, Kai
Fix it in v3. Thank you for the review.
Regards,
Brent
Powered by blists - more mailing lists