[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200818163356.GG137138@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 19:33:56 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: Use module_name() macro
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:49:56PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:08:57 +0300
> Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > It is advised to use module_name() macro instead of dereferencing mod->name
> > directly. This makes sense for consistencys sake and also it prevents a
> > hard dependency to CONFIG_MODULES.
> >
> > Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
> > Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
> > Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
>
> OK, this looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Great, thank you.
When this might get included to a PR, or at minimum land to linux-next?
Just thinking what to use as the baseline for the next version of my
main series.
BR,
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists