lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8771fd4f-23ca-3685-47f6-b310faa18629@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:28:11 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...il.com>,
        Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
        "maintainer:BROADCOM BCM5301X ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: BCM5301X: Fix pin controller node

On 8/19/20 8:36 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 at 06:23, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
>> The pin controller resources start at 0xc0 from the CRU base which is at
>> 0x100 from th DMU base, for a final address of 0x1800_c1c0, whereas we
>> are currently off by 0x100. The resource size of the CRU is also
>> incorrect and should end at 0x248 bytes from 0x100 which is the start
>> address. Finally, the compatibility strings defined for the
>> pin-controller node should reflect the SoC being used.
>>
>> Fixes: 9994241ac97c ("ARM: dts: BCM5301X: Describe Northstar pins mux controller")
> 
> Let me verify that fix. I'm confused as I believe I got pinctrl
> working for uart1 :|

Sure, please let me know what you find. Chances are that UART1 was
already pinmuxed corectly by the boot loader for your device and this
could have turned out as a no-op.
-- 
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ