linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with the kspp-gustavo tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Aug 2020 09:26:31 +0300
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with the kspp-gustavo tree

Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> writes:

> Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree got a
> conflict in:
>
>   drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_rx.c
>
> between commit:
>
>   58e813cceabd ("treewide: Use fallthrough pseudo-keyword")
>
> from the kspp-gustavo tree and commit:
>
>   0b294aebb6a0 ("ath11k: Use fallthrough pseudo-keyword")
>
> from the wireless-drivers-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the latter removed an extra blank line) and can carry the
> fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
> but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
> maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want
> to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
> minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

Gustavo, why do you have patches changing ath11k in your tree? PLEASE
don't do that! Instead properly send them to linux-wireless and ath11k
lists, as you have done before. That way there are no unncessary
conflicts like this one which cause extra work for the maintainers.

-- 
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches