[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfDq7bRe6YQdUQyv=8jK737-QwpxZjGZ2HxCJ7iaQPwMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:54:11 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: "Tanwar, Rahul" <rahul.tanwar@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, songjun.Wu@...el.com,
cheol.yong.kim@...el.com, qi-ming.wu@...el.com,
rahul.tanwar.linux@...il.com, rtanwar@...linear.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/2] pwm: intel: Add PWM driver for a new SoC
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 7:18 AM Tanwar, Rahul
<rahul.tanwar@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Andy,
>
> On 18/8/2020 4:38 pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 01:48:59PM +0800, Rahul Tanwar wrote:
> >> Patch 1 adds dt binding document in YAML format.
> >> Patch 2 add PWM fan controller driver for LGM SoC.
> >>
> >> v7:
> >> - Address code quality related review concerns.
> >> - Rename fan related property to pwm-*.
> >> - Fix one make dt_binding_check reported error.
> > I guess it misses the answer why pwm-fan can't be integrated into the soup?
> >
>
> Can you please elaborate more? I could not understand your point clearly.
It's not mine, it's Uwe's. There is an hwmon module called pwm-fan. As
far as *I* understand this, it can be utilized to control fans via PWM
APIs. And Uwe asked you if you considered that and why you don't
integrated (coupled) it here.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists