[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e9e4804b-f036-a1f8-63b6-b51592d9a0c5@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 11:14:55 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: v5.9-rc1 commit reliably breaks pci nvme detection
On 8/20/20 11:12 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 11:10:58AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> To be fair, I've only heard this one complaint about it, so hopefully it's
>> not too widespread. I'm on an x86-64 laptop myself with nvme, and it works
>> just fine :-)
>
> The cause for this is the weird NVMe of by ones, where 0 in a field
> means 1. So for the overflow to happen you need a controller that
> supports USHORT_MAX queue entries. Which don't seem to be all that
> common.
Yeah, don't think I've ever seen those. I come across 1023 and 128 all
the time, but I don't have one in my arsenal of NVMe drives that is
any different than those two.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists