[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200821080813.GM4353@alley>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:08:14 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kieran Bingham <kbingham@...nel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2][next] update gdb scripts for lockless printk
ringbuffer
On Fri 2020-08-14 23:31:23, John Ogness wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When we brought in the new lockless printk ringbuffer, we overlooked the gdb
> scripts. Here are a set of patches to implement gdb support for the new
> ringbuffer.
>
> John Ogness (2):
> scripts/gdb: add utils.read_ulong()
> scripts/gdb: update for lockless printk ringbuffer
I am not fluent in the gdb macros and python so I did not try any
deep review. But both patches work for me:
Tested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
I am going to give it few more days before pushing just in case there is
another feedback.
Best Regards,
Petr
BTW: Are you aware of https://github.com/crash-python/crash-python project?
The ambition is to implement "crash" features and even more into
gdb using python extensions. It similar approach like
scripts/gdb/
crash-python is being developed sporadically in waves. It is
mostly during a week that is dedicated for such projects
at SUSE. It would be great to get more contributors.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists