[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200822060345.GD17129@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 07:03:45 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>,
Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...hat.com>, darrick.wong@...cle.com,
david@...morbit.com, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V3] iomap: add support to track dirty state of sub
pages
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 02:36:57PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 07:12:34AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > iomap sets PagePrivate if a iomap_page structure is allocated. Right
> > now that means for all pages on a file system with a block size smaller
> > than the page size, although I hope we reduce that scope a little.
>
> I was thinking about that. Is there a problem where we initially allocate
> the page with a contiguous extent larger than the page, then later need
> to write the page to a pair of extents?
>
> If we're doing an unshare operation, then we know our src and dest iomaps
> and can allocate the iop then. But if we readahead, we don't necessarily
> know our eventual dest. So the conditions for skipping allocating an
> iop are tricky to be sure we'll never need it.
So with the current codebase (that is without your THP work that I need
to re-review) the decision should be pretty easy:
- check if block size >= PAGE, and if yes don't allocate
- check if the extent fully covers the page, and if yes don't allocate
Now with THP we'd just need to check the thp size instead of the page
above and be fine, or do I miss something?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists