[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200822.140758.1768310758210192749.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 14:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: joe@...ches.com
Cc: Jianlin.Lv@....com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org,
Song.Zhu@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Remove unnecessary intermediate variables
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 14:03:31 -0700
> The compiler didn't inline the code without it.
Then the compiler had a good reason for doing so, or it's a compiler
bug that should be reported.
I would reject any patch that added inline to a foo.c file, so unless
you want to make suggestions that will cause a contributor's patch to
be rejected, I'd suggest you not recommend inline usage in this way.
Thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists