lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200824114204.cc796ca182db95809dd70a47@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:42:04 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     mgorman@...hsingularity.net, tj@...nel.org, hughd@...gle.com,
        khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru, daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com,
        willy@...radead.org, hannes@...xchg.org, lkp@...el.com,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, shakeelb@...gle.com,
        iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, richard.weiyang@...il.com,
        kirill@...temov.name, alexander.duyck@...il.com,
        rong.a.chen@...el.com, mhocko@...e.com, vdavydov.dev@...il.com,
        shy828301@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 00/32] per memcg lru_lock

On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 20:54:33 +0800 Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:

> The new version which bases on v5.9-rc2. The first 6 patches was picked into
> linux-mm, and add patch 25-32 that do some further post optimization.

32 patches, version 18.  That's quite heroic.  I'm unsure whether I
should merge it up at this point - what do people think?

> 
> Following Daniel Jordan's suggestion, I have run 208 'dd' with on 104
> containers on a 2s * 26cores * HT box with a modefied case:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/vm-scalability.git/tree/case-lru-file-readtwice
> With this patchset, the readtwice performance increased about 80%
> in concurrent containers.

That's rather a slight amount of performance testing for a huge
performance patchset!  Is more detailed testing planned?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ