[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200824195009.GE4337@lca.pw>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 15:50:10 -0400
From: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
tj@...nel.org, hughd@...gle.com, khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru,
daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com, willy@...radead.org,
hannes@...xchg.org, lkp@...el.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
shakeelb@...gle.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
richard.weiyang@...il.com, kirill@...temov.name,
alexander.duyck@...il.com, rong.a.chen@...el.com, mhocko@...e.com,
vdavydov.dev@...il.com, shy828301@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 00/32] per memcg lru_lock
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 11:42:04AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 20:54:33 +0800 Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> > The new version which bases on v5.9-rc2. The first 6 patches was picked into
> > linux-mm, and add patch 25-32 that do some further post optimization.
>
> 32 patches, version 18. That's quite heroic. I'm unsure whether I
> should merge it up at this point - what do people think?
I certainly hope not given how buggy the previous reversion and Alex's other
patchset are. There is really no room for the shortcut this time.
>
> >
> > Following Daniel Jordan's suggestion, I have run 208 'dd' with on 104
> > containers on a 2s * 26cores * HT box with a modefied case:
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/vm-scalability.git/tree/case-lru-file-readtwice
> > With this patchset, the readtwice performance increased about 80%
> > in concurrent containers.
>
> That's rather a slight amount of performance testing for a huge
> performance patchset! Is more detailed testing planned?
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists