[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9974f2d0-bf7f-518e-d9f7-4520e5ff1bb0@foss.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:28:34 +0100
From: Al Grant <al.grant@...s.arm.com>
To: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ak@...ux.intel.com, acme@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH] perf: correct SNOOPX field offset
perf_event.h has macros that define the field offsets in the
data_src bitmask in perf records. The SNOOPX and REMOTE offsets
were both 37. These are distinct fields, and the bitfield layout
in perf_mem_data_src confirms that SNOOPX should be at offset 38.
From: Al Grant <al.grant@....com>
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 2 +-
tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
index 077e7ee69e3d..3e5dcdd48a49 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -1196,7 +1196,7 @@ union perf_mem_data_src {
#define PERF_MEM_SNOOPX_FWD 0x01 /* forward */
/* 1 free */
-#define PERF_MEM_SNOOPX_SHIFT 37
+#define PERF_MEM_SNOOPX_SHIFT 38
/* locked instruction */
#define PERF_MEM_LOCK_NA 0x01 /* not available */
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
b/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
index 077e7ee69e3d..3e5dcdd48a49 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -1196,7 +1196,7 @@ union perf_mem_data_src {
#define PERF_MEM_SNOOPX_FWD 0x01 /* forward */
/* 1 free */
-#define PERF_MEM_SNOOPX_SHIFT 37
+#define PERF_MEM_SNOOPX_SHIFT 38
/* locked instruction */
#define PERF_MEM_LOCK_NA 0x01 /* not available */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists