[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200825174043.GQ1509399@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:40:43 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Al Grant <al.grant@...s.arm.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
acme@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: correct SNOOPX field offset
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:28:34AM +0100, Al Grant wrote:
> perf_event.h has macros that define the field offsets in the
> data_src bitmask in perf records. The SNOOPX and REMOTE offsets
> were both 37. These are distinct fields, and the bitfield layout
> in perf_mem_data_src confirms that SNOOPX should be at offset 38.
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Probably should have a Fixes: header
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists