lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:40:43 -0700 From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> To: Al Grant <al.grant@...s.arm.com> Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...hat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: correct SNOOPX field offset On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:28:34AM +0100, Al Grant wrote: > perf_event.h has macros that define the field offsets in the > data_src bitmask in perf records. The SNOOPX and REMOTE offsets > were both 37. These are distinct fields, and the bitfield layout > in perf_mem_data_src confirms that SNOOPX should be at offset 38. Looks good. Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> Probably should have a Fixes: header -Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists