lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 11:49:16 -0500 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com> To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@...il.com> Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>, Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...el.com>, Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/qib: remove superfluous fallthrough statements On 8/25/20 11:26, Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2020-08-25 at 11:19 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: >> >> On 8/25/20 10:51, Alex Dewar wrote: >>> Commit 36a8f01cd24b ("IB/qib: Add congestion control agent implementation") >>> erroneously marked a couple of switch cases as /* FALLTHROUGH */, which >>> were later converted to fallthrough statements by commit df561f6688fe >>> ("treewide: Use fallthrough pseudo-keyword"). This triggered a Coverity >>> warning about unreachable code. >>> >>> Remove the fallthrough statements and replace the mass of gotos with >>> simple return statements to make the code terser and less bug-prone. >>> >> >> This should be split up into two separate patches: one to address the >> fallthrough markings, and another one for the gotos. > > I don't think it's necessary to break this into multiple patches. > Logical changes in a single patch are just fine, micro patches > aren't that useful. > There is a reason for this. Read the changelog text and review the patch. Thanks -- Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists