linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v36 11/24] x86/sgx: Add SGX enclave driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200825164412.GF12107@zn.tnic>
Date:   Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:44:12 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Jethro Beekman <jethro@...tanix.com>,
        Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Chunyang Hui <sanqian.hcy@...fin.com>,
        Jordan Hand <jorhand@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        Nathaniel McCallum <npmccallum@...hat.com>,
        Seth Moore <sethmo@...gle.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, asapek@...gle.com,
        cedric.xing@...el.com, chenalexchen@...gle.com,
        conradparker@...gle.com, cyhanish@...gle.com,
        dave.hansen@...el.com, haitao.huang@...el.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, kai.huang@...el.com, kai.svahn@...el.com,
        kmoy@...gle.com, ludloff@...gle.com, luto@...nel.org,
        nhorman@...hat.com, puiterwijk@...hat.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, yaozhangx@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v36 11/24] x86/sgx: Add SGX enclave driver

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 04:52:50PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:

Just minor things below - I'm not even going to pretend I fully
understand what's going on but FWICT, it looks non-threateningly ok to
me.

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b52520407f5b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,177 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause)
> +// Copyright(c) 2016-18 Intel Corporation.
> +
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
> +#include <linux/mman.h>
> +#include <linux/security.h>
> +#include <linux/suspend.h>
> +#include <asm/traps.h>
> +#include "driver.h"
> +#include "encl.h"
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Intel SGX Enclave Driver");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");

That boilerplate stuff usually goes to the end of the file.

...

> +static struct sgx_encl_page *sgx_encl_load_page(struct sgx_encl *encl,
> +						unsigned long addr)
> +{
> +	struct sgx_encl_page *entry;
> +	unsigned int flags;
> +
> +	/* If process was forked, VMA is still there but vm_private_data is set
> +	 * to NULL.
> +	 */
> +	if (!encl)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
> +
> +	flags = atomic_read(&encl->flags);
> +

^ Superfluous newline.

> +	if ((flags & SGX_ENCL_DEAD) || !(flags & SGX_ENCL_INITIALIZED))
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
> +
> +	entry = xa_load(&encl->page_array, PFN_DOWN(addr));
> +	if (!entry)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
> +
> +	/* Page is already resident in the EPC. */
> +	if (entry->epc_page)
> +		return entry;
> +
> +	return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
> +}
> +
> +static void sgx_mmu_notifier_release(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
> +				     struct mm_struct *mm)
> +{
> +	struct sgx_encl_mm *encl_mm =
> +		container_of(mn, struct sgx_encl_mm, mmu_notifier);

Just let it stick out.

> +	struct sgx_encl_mm *tmp = NULL;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The enclave itself can remove encl_mm.  Note, objects can't be moved
> +	 * off an RCU protected list, but deletion is ok.
> +	 */
> +	spin_lock(&encl_mm->encl->mm_lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry(tmp, &encl_mm->encl->mm_list, list) {
> +		if (tmp == encl_mm) {
> +			list_del_rcu(&encl_mm->list);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock(&encl_mm->encl->mm_lock);
> +
> +	if (tmp == encl_mm) {
> +		synchronize_srcu(&encl_mm->encl->srcu);
> +		mmu_notifier_put(mn);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void sgx_mmu_notifier_free(struct mmu_notifier *mn)
> +{
> +	struct sgx_encl_mm *encl_mm =
> +		container_of(mn, struct sgx_encl_mm, mmu_notifier);

Ditto.

...

> +/**
> + * sgx_encl_may_map() - Check if a requested VMA mapping is allowed
> + * @encl:		an enclave
> + * @start:		lower bound of the address range, inclusive
> + * @end:		upper bound of the address range, exclusive
> + * @vm_prot_bits:	requested protections of the address range
> + *
> + * Iterate through the enclave pages contained within [@start, @end) to verify
> + * the permissions requested by @vm_prot_bits do not exceed that of any enclave
> + * page to be mapped.
> + *
> + * Return:
> + *   0 on success,
> + *   -EACCES if VMA permissions exceed enclave page permissions
> + */
> +int sgx_encl_may_map(struct sgx_encl *encl, unsigned long start,
> +		     unsigned long end, unsigned long vm_flags)
> +{
> +	unsigned long vm_prot_bits = vm_flags & (VM_READ | VM_WRITE | VM_EXEC);
> +	unsigned long idx_start = PFN_DOWN(start);
> +	unsigned long idx_end = PFN_DOWN(end - 1);
> +	struct sgx_encl_page *page;
> +	XA_STATE(xas, &encl->page_array, idx_start);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Disallow RIE tasks as their VMA permissions might conflict with the

"RIE", hmm what is that?

/me looks at the test

Aaah, READ_IMPLIES_EXEC. Is "RIE" some widely accepted acronym I'm not
aware of?

> +	 * enclave page permissions.
> +	 */
> +	if (!!(current->personality & READ_IMPLIES_EXEC))

The "!!" is not really needed - you're in boolean context.

...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette