[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <76392bff28359a88fbdf0857f011e0ed9f666dc4.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 12:52:05 -0400
From: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
To: Ben Skeggs <skeggsb@...il.com>
Cc: ML nouveau <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS"
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier
offset before requesting disp caps
On Tue, 2020-08-25 at 08:28 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 04:33, Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com> wrote:
> > Not entirely sure why this never came up when I originally tested this
> > (maybe some BIOSes already have this setup?) but the ->caps_init vfunc
> > appears to cause the display engine to throw an exception on driver
> > init, at least on my ThinkPad P72:
> >
> > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: disp: chid 0 mthd 008c data 00000000 0000508c 0000102b
> >
> > This is magic nvidia speak for "You need to have the DMA notifier offset
> > programmed before you can call NV507D_GET_CAPABILITIES." So, let's fix
> > this by doing that, and also perform an update afterwards to prevent
> > racing with the GPU when reading capabilities.
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > * Don't just program the DMA notifier offset, make sure to actually
> > perform an update
> I'm not sure there's a need to send an Update() method here, I believe
> GetCapabilities() is an action method on its own right?
>
I'm not entirely sure about this part tbh. I do know that we need to call
GetCapabilities() _after_ the DMA notifier offset is programmed. But, my
assumption was that if GetCapabilities() requires a DMA notifier offset to store
its results in, we'd probably want to fire an update or something to make sure
that we're not reading before it finishes writing capabilities?
> Ben.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
> > Fixes: 4a2cb4181b07 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Probe SOR and PIOR caps for DP
> > interlacing support")
> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v5.8+
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c
> > index e341f572c2696..5e86feec3b720 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c
> > @@ -65,13 +65,26 @@ core507d_ntfy_init(struct nouveau_bo *bo, u32 offset)
> > int
> > core507d_caps_init(struct nouveau_drm *drm, struct nv50_disp *disp)
> > {
> > - u32 *push = evo_wait(&disp->core->chan, 2);
> > + struct nv50_core *core = disp->core;
> > + u32 interlock[NV50_DISP_INTERLOCK__SIZE] = {0};
> > + u32 *push;
> >
> > - if (push) {
> > - evo_mthd(push, 0x008c, 1);
> > - evo_data(push, 0x0);
> > - evo_kick(push, &disp->core->chan);
> > - }
> > + core->func->ntfy_init(disp->sync, NV50_DISP_CORE_NTFY);
> > +
> > + push = evo_wait(&core->chan, 4);
> > + if (!push)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + evo_mthd(push, 0x0084, 1);
> > + evo_data(push, 0x80000000 | NV50_DISP_CORE_NTFY);
> > + evo_mthd(push, 0x008c, 1);
> > + evo_data(push, 0x0);
> > + evo_kick(push, &core->chan);
> > +
> > + core->func->update(core, interlock, false);
> > + if (core->func->ntfy_wait_done(disp->sync, NV50_DISP_CORE_NTFY,
> > + core->chan.base.device))
> > + NV_ERROR(drm, "core notifier timeout\n");
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.26.2
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nouveau mailing list
> > Nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
--
Sincerely,
Lyude Paul (she/her)
Software Engineer at Red Hat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists