linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] IB/qib: remove superfluous fallthrough statements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1e9f4efd420c7ff516097050f1f50d0299a1e180.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Aug 2020 13:55:23 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
        Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@...il.com>
Cc:     Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>,
        Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...el.com>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/qib: remove superfluous fallthrough statements

On Tue, 2020-08-25 at 12:01 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> On 8/25/20 11:47, Joe Perches wrote
[]
> You would have noticed this should be two patches.

That's interpretational.

> > I think your desire for micropatches is unnecessary.
> > 
> You might be generalizing. My 'desire' here is justified and specific.

And to date undescribed.