[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87sgcbwcnf.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Date: 25 Aug 2020 13:54:28 +0900
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
To: Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>
Cc: <broonie@...nel.org>, <perex@...ex.cz>, <tiwai@...e.com>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
<thierry.reding@...il.com>, <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <sharadg@...dia.com>,
<mkumard@...dia.com>, <viswanathl@...dia.com>,
<rlokhande@...dia.com>, <dramesh@...dia.com>,
<atalambedu@...dia.com>, <nwartikar@...dia.com>,
<swarren@...dia.com>, <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] ASoC: audio-graph: Identify 'no_pcm' DAI links for DPCM
Hi Sameer
> +static bool soc_component_is_pcm(struct snd_soc_dai_link_component *dlc)
> +{
> + struct snd_soc_dai *dai = snd_soc_find_dai(dlc);
> +
> + if (dai && (dai->component->driver->pcm_construct ||
> + dai->driver->pcm_new))
> + return true;
> +
> + return false;
> +}
(snip)
> I tried testing this with LOCKDEP config enabled at my end.
> It seems I don't see warning originated from above function.
> Are you suggesting that, in general, snd_soc_find_dai()
> should be called with client_mutex held?
Hmm ? strange...
snd_soc_find_dai() is using lockdep_assert_held()
struct snd_soc_dai *snd_soc_find_dai(...)
{
...
=> lockdep_assert_held(&client_mutex);
...
}
and lockdep_assert_held() will indicate WARN_ON()
-- lockdep.h --
...
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
...
#define lockdep_assert_held(l) do { \
=> WARN_ON(debug_locks && !lockdep_is_held(l)); \
} while (0)
> May be snd_soc_dai_link_set_capabilities() requires similar fix?
Yes, I'm posting fixup patch.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11719919/
Thank you for your help !!
Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto
Powered by blists - more mailing lists