lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:45:53 +0530 From: Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com> To: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com> CC: <broonie@...nel.org>, <perex@...ex.cz>, <tiwai@...e.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <lgirdwood@...il.com>, <thierry.reding@...il.com>, <jonathanh@...dia.com>, <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <sharadg@...dia.com>, <mkumard@...dia.com>, <viswanathl@...dia.com>, <rlokhande@...dia.com>, <dramesh@...dia.com>, <atalambedu@...dia.com>, <nwartikar@...dia.com>, <swarren@...dia.com>, <nicoleotsuka@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] ASoC: audio-graph: Identify 'no_pcm' DAI links for DPCM Hi Morimoto-san, > (snip) >> I tried testing this with LOCKDEP config enabled at my end. >> It seems I don't see warning originated from above function. >> Are you suggesting that, in general, snd_soc_find_dai() >> should be called with client_mutex held? > Hmm ? strange... Yes indeed. For saftely I will follow the same as other callers are doing. ... > Yes, I'm posting fixup patch. > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11719919/ Just curious that why snd_soc_find_dai() itself cannot be protected, instead of leaving this to callers. Thanks, Sameer.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists