[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87o8mzwajg.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Date: 25 Aug 2020 14:40:02 +0900
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
To: Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>
Cc: <broonie@...nel.org>, <perex@...ex.cz>, <tiwai@...e.com>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
<thierry.reding@...il.com>, <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <sharadg@...dia.com>,
<mkumard@...dia.com>, <viswanathl@...dia.com>,
<rlokhande@...dia.com>, <dramesh@...dia.com>,
<atalambedu@...dia.com>, <nwartikar@...dia.com>,
<swarren@...dia.com>, <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] ASoC: audio-graph: Identify 'no_pcm' DAI links for DPCM
Hi Sameer
> > Yes, I'm posting fixup patch.
> >
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11719919/
>
> Just curious that why snd_soc_find_dai() itself cannot be protected,
> instead of leaving this to callers.
Because, snd_soc_find_dai() is called both with/without client_mutex.
(same/sof are calling it with mutex, simple-card/audio-graph are calling without mutex)
Other solution is create both snd_soc_find_dai_with_mutex()/without_mutex().
I'm not sure which style is best.
Thank you for your help !!
Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto
Powered by blists - more mailing lists