lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 11:51:58 +0200 From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> To: Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Cc: x86@...nel.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>, Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>, Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>, Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>, Russ Anderson <rja@....com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Megha Dey <megha.dey@...el.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>, Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...el.com>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> Subject: Re: [patch RFC 24/38] x86/xen: Consolidate XEN-MSI init On Tue, Aug 25 2020 at 06:21, Jürgen Groß wrote: > On 24.08.20 23:21, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> I still think it does the right thing depending on the place it is >> called from, but even if so, it's completely unreadable gunk. I'll fix >> that proper. > > The main issue is that xen_initial_domain() and xen_pv_domain() are > orthogonal to each other. So xen_initial_domain() can either be true > for xen_pv_domain() (the "classic" pv dom0) or for xen_hvm_domain() > (the new PVH dom0). Fair enough. My limited XENology striked again.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists