lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 13:52:30 +0100 From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> To: Steven Price <steven.price@....com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@...wei.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] KVM: arm64: Add pvtime LPT support On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 09:54:40AM +0100, Steven Price wrote: > On 18/08/2020 15:41, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On 2020-08-17 09:41, Keqian Zhu wrote: > We are discussing (re-)releasing the spec with the LPT parts added. If you > have fundamental objections then please me know. Like Marc, I argued strongly for the removal of the LPT bits on the premise that it didn't really work (e.g. when transistioning between SW agents) and so it was a pure maintenance burden. I don't think the technical arguments have changed, and I don't think it's a good idea to try to ressurect this. Please rope me in if this comes up in internal discussions. Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists