[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4b0147df-b773-6c04-ff08-0bbc8b668f5f@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 20:57:13 +0800
From: "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: <timur@...nel.org>, <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
<Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>, <festevam@...il.com>,
<shengjiu.wang@...il.com>, <lgirdwood@...il.com>, <perex@...ex.cz>,
<tiwai@...e.com>, <shawnguo@...nel.org>, <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
<kernel@...gutronix.de>, <linux-imx@....com>, <xobs@...agi.com>,
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <yukuai@...wei.com>,
<yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: fsl: imx-es8328: add missing kfree() call in
imx_es8328_probe()
On 2020/08/25 20:11, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 08:05:30PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
>> If memory allocation for 'data' or 'comp' succeed, imx_es8328_probe()
>> doesn't have corresponding kfree() in exception handling. Thus add
>> kfree() for this function implementation.
>
>> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static int imx_es8328_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> comp = devm_kzalloc(dev, 3 * sizeof(*comp), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!comp) {
>
> The allocation is being done using devm_ which means no explicit kfree()
> is needed, the allocation will be automatically unwound when the device
> is unbound.
Hi,
Thanks for pointing it out, I'll remove this patch.
Best regards,
Yu Kuai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists