[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200825005347.6bslsr3jfayuce5q@kafai-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 17:53:47 -0700
From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To: KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 3/7] bpf: Generalize bpf_sk_storage
On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 06:56:08PM +0200, KP Singh wrote:
> From: KP Singh <kpsingh@...gle.com>
>
> Refactor the functionality in bpf_sk_storage.c so that concept of
> storage linked to kernel objects can be extended to other objects like
> inode, task_struct etc.
>
> Each new local storage will still be a separate map and provide its own
> set of helpers. This allows for future object specific extensions and
> still share a lot of the underlying implementation.
>
> This includes the changes suggested by Martin in:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200725013047.4006241-1-kafai@fb.com/
>
> adding new map operations to support bpf_local_storage maps:
>
> * storages for different kernel objects to optionally have different
> memory charging strategy (map_local_storage_charge,
> map_local_storage_uncharge)
> * Functionality to extract the storage pointer from a pointer to the
> owning object (map_owner_storage_ptr)
>
> Co-developed-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
> Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists