[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiAK=AiqTD47o-BFFZciQXpEC0SiiDnXLWJUcQtCo-Pig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 11:04:32 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Harald Arnesen <harald@...gtun.org>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@...el.com>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] 5.9-rc1: graphics regression moved from -next to mainline
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 2:30 AM Harald Arnesen <harald@...gtun.org> wrote:
>
> Somehow related to lightdm or xfce4? However, it is a regression, since
> kernel 5.8 works.
Yeah, apparently there's something else wrong with the relocation changes too.
That said, does that patch at
https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/20200821123746.16904-1-joro@8bytes.org/
change things at all? If there are two independent bugs, maybe
applying that patch might at least give you an oops that gets saved in
the logs?
(it might be worth waiting a bit after the machine locks up in case
the machine is alive enough so sync logs after a bit.. If ssh works,
that's obviously better yet)
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists