[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <101bff45-0ebd-8fb6-7c99-963aa4fcc588@skogtun.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 22:44:12 +0200
From: Harald Arnesen <harald@...gtun.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@...el.com>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] 5.9-rc1: graphics regression moved from -next to
mainline
Linus Torvalds [26.08.2020 20:04]:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 2:30 AM Harald Arnesen <harald@...gtun.org> wrote:
>> Somehow related to lightdm or xfce4? However, it is a regression, since
>> kernel 5.8 works.
> Yeah, apparently there's something else wrong with the relocation changes too.
>
> That said, does that patch at
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/20200821123746.16904-1-joro@8bytes.org/
>
> change things at all? If there are two independent bugs, maybe
> applying that patch might at least give you an oops that gets saved in
> the logs?
>
> (it might be worth waiting a bit after the machine locks up in case
> the machine is alive enough so sync logs after a bit.. If ssh works,
> that's obviously better yet)
No, doesn't help. And I was wrong, ssh does not work at all when the
display locks up.
--
Hilsen Harald
Powered by blists - more mailing lists