linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-gfx] 5.9-rc1: graphics regression moved from -next to mainline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPM=9twLvHu_XLJ89GVXpNo=PHPZLJuRpHggkfzvvuVf+xrwoA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Aug 2020 06:47:35 +1000
From:   Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
To:     Harald Arnesen <harald@...gtun.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
        Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@...el.com>,
        intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] 5.9-rc1: graphics regression moved from -next to mainline

On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 06:44, Harald Arnesen <harald@...gtun.org> wrote:
>
> Linus Torvalds [26.08.2020 20:04]:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 2:30 AM Harald Arnesen <harald@...gtun.org> wrote:
> >> Somehow related to lightdm or xfce4? However, it is a regression, since
> >> kernel 5.8 works.
> > Yeah, apparently there's something else wrong with the relocation changes too.
> >
> > That said, does that patch at
> >
> >   https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/20200821123746.16904-1-joro@8bytes.org/
> >
> > change things at all? If there are two independent bugs, maybe
> > applying that patch might at least give you an oops that gets saved in
> > the logs?
> >
> > (it might be worth waiting a bit after the machine locks up in case
> > the machine is alive enough so sync logs after a bit.. If ssh works,
> > that's obviously better yet)
>
> No, doesn't help. And I was wrong, ssh does not work at all when the
> display locks up.

Did you say what hw you had? is it the same hw as Pavel or different?

Dave.