linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-gfx] 5.9-rc1: graphics regression moved from -next to mainline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0f06d704-c14e-0d86-c8bb-8c7b3a34758a@skogtun.org>
Date:   Wed, 26 Aug 2020 22:53:28 +0200
From:   Harald Arnesen <harald@...gtun.org>
To:     Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
        Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@...el.com>,
        intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] 5.9-rc1: graphics regression moved from -next to
 mainline

Dave Airlie [26.08.2020 22:47]:

> On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 06:44, Harald Arnesen <harald@...gtun.org> wrote:
>>
>> Linus Torvalds [26.08.2020 20:04]:
>>
>> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 2:30 AM Harald Arnesen <harald@...gtun.org> wrote:
>> >> Somehow related to lightdm or xfce4? However, it is a regression, since
>> >> kernel 5.8 works.
>> > Yeah, apparently there's something else wrong with the relocation changes too.
>> >
>> > That said, does that patch at
>> >
>> >   https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/20200821123746.16904-1-joro@8bytes.org/
>> >
>> > change things at all? If there are two independent bugs, maybe
>> > applying that patch might at least give you an oops that gets saved in
>> > the logs?
>> >
>> > (it might be worth waiting a bit after the machine locks up in case
>> > the machine is alive enough so sync logs after a bit.. If ssh works,
>> > that's obviously better yet)
>>
>> No, doesn't help. And I was wrong, ssh does not work at all when the
>> display locks up.
> 
> Did you say what hw you had? is it the same hw as Pavel or different?
> 
> Dave.
> 

It's a Thinkpad T520.
Output from 'lspci' attached.

-- 
Hilsen Harald

View attachment "hw.txt" of type "text/plain" (1779 bytes)