[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200826191708.GA13466@kozik-lap>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 21:17:08 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>,
Sangwon Jee <jeesw@...fas.com>,
Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/24] Input: bcm-keypad - Simplify with dev_err_probe()
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 10:12:17PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 08:16:43PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Common pattern of handling deferred probe can be simplified with
> > dev_err_probe(). Less code and also it prints the error value.
>
> > +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/bcm-keypad.c
> > @@ -379,11 +379,9 @@ static int bcm_kp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > kp->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "peri_clk");
> > if (IS_ERR(kp->clk)) {
> > error = PTR_ERR(kp->clk);
> > - if (error != -ENOENT) {
> > - if (error != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get clock\n");
> > - return error;
> > - }
> > + if (error != -ENOENT)
> > + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, error, "Failed to get clock\n");
> > +
> > dev_dbg(&pdev->dev,
> > "No clock specified. Assuming it's enabled\n");
>
> Shouldn't be this rather switch to devm_clk_get_optional() + dev_err_probe?
Indeed, it could be simplified even more. I'll send v2.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists