[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200826192256.GA14739@kozik-lap>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 21:22:56 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>,
Sangwon Jee <jeesw@...fas.com>,
Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/24] Input: gpio_keys - Simplify with dev_err_probe()
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 10:13:34PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 08:16:44PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Common pattern of handling deferred probe can be simplified with
> > dev_err_probe(). Less code and also it prints the error value.
>
> > --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c
> > @@ -505,10 +505,7 @@ static int gpio_keys_setup_key(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > */
> > bdata->gpiod = NULL;
>
> gpiod_get_optional()?
> Do not see much context though (but please double check your series for these
> kind of things).
It would fit except it is devm_fwnode_gpiod_get() which does not have
optional yet.
I can add it although the scope of the patch grows from simple
defer-path-simplification.
Thanks for the feedback.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists