linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] iio: dpot-dac: fix code comment in dpot_dac_read

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:25:29 -0500
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
To:     Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Cc:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: dpot-dac: fix code comment in dpot_dac_read_raw()

On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 04:16:23PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2020-08-26 16:17, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> >> And just to be explicit, this fix is for 5.9.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
> >>
> > 
> > If you don't mind I can add this to my tree for 5.9-rc4
> > and send it directly to Linus.
> 
> Fine by me, Jonathan might think differently but I can't find a reason why.
> Just about nothing is happening in that file and the risk for conflicts is
> negligible.
> 

OK. In the meantime, I have added this to my -next tree and queued it up
for 5.9-rc3.

Thanks
--
Gustavo