[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200829165249.416b2efa@archlinux>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 16:52:49 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: dpot-dac: fix code comment in dpot_dac_read_raw()
On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:25:29 -0500
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 04:16:23PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> > On 2020-08-26 16:17, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > >> And just to be explicit, this fix is for 5.9.
> > >>
> > >> Acked-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
> > >>
> > >
> > > If you don't mind I can add this to my tree for 5.9-rc4
> > > and send it directly to Linus.
> >
> > Fine by me, Jonathan might think differently but I can't find a reason why.
> > Just about nothing is happening in that file and the risk for conflicts is
> > negligible.
> >
>
> OK. In the meantime, I have added this to my -next tree and queued it up
> for 5.9-rc3.
Absolutely fine by me.
Thanks,
Jonathan
>
> Thanks
> --
> Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists