lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegvqZUXsvbWg8K-xosNR+RVwRm2KH+S9mKs6n6Sv65s+Qg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Aug 2020 21:26:29 +0200
From:   Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:     "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>
Cc:     Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
        virtio-fs-list <virtio-fs@...hat.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/18] fuse: implement FUSE_INIT map_alignment field

On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 9:17 PM Dr. David Alan Gilbert
<dgilbert@...hat.com> wrote:

> Agreed, because there's not much that the server can do about it if the
> client would like a smaller granularity - the servers granularity might
> be dictated by it's mmap/pagesize/filesystem.  If the client wants a
> larger granularity that's it's choice when it sends the setupmapping
> calls.

What bothers me is that the server now comes with the built in 2MiB
granularity (obviously much larger than actually needed).

What if at some point we'd want to reduce that somewhat in the client?
  Yeah, we can't.   Maybe this is not a kernel problem after all, the
proper thing would be to fix the server to actually send something
meaningful.

Thanks,
Miklos

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ