[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fe112ace-659b-0e7e-fd6f-e34987fc17ed@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 17:43:52 +0800
From: "Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX"
<vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, thomas.langer@...el.com,
cheol.yong.kim@...el.com, qi-ming.wu@...el.com, yin1.li@...el.com,
krzk@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] extcon: extcon-ptn5150: Add the USB external
connector support
Hi Andy,
On 26/8/2020 5:18 pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 10:51:37AM +0800, Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
>> On 25/8/2020 4:19 pm, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 04:45:38PM +0800, Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
>>>> On 19/8/2020 3:55 pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 8:38 AM Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX
>>>>> <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 18/8/2020 4:40 pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 02:57:18PM +0800, Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
>>>>>>>> USB external connector chip PTN5150 used on the Intel LGM SoC
>>>>>>>> boards to detect the USB type and connection.
>>>>>>> Internally I meant you can send cleanups, but couple of patches here are the
>>>>>>> features and were still under discussion... But here we are.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you mean asking us to implement the Heikki suggested as below..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Heikki Krogerus: register the port and the partner attached to it with
>>>>>> the USB Type-C connector class in the driver. Is my understaanding
>>>>>> right? if not, please explain it. Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> When you mention somebody, don't forget to Cc them (now done by me).
>>>> Sure, Thank you
>>>
>>> So the patches 1-5 are fine. The rest needs to be rewritten.
>> Already Krzysztof submitted all the patches and got approved, so we started
>> sending only one patch which support to Intel LGM SoC based boards, Thanks!
>
> I'm not sure what you meant by above.
>
> Krzysztof suggested you to squash all first patches into 1 (or two) and he
> approves it. What you have to do is follow his advise and send v2 where it will
> be one (or two) patch with his tag attached.
Yes, you're right, the above discussion was before Krzysztof reviewed my
patches, sure will follow his advise, thanks!
Regards
Vadivel
>
> Krzysztof, is it correct what I'm saying?
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists