[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5ha6yhu3af.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 12:09:28 +0200
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
vkoul@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jank@...ence.com,
srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, slawomir.blauciak@...el.com,
Bard liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Rander Wang <rander.wang@...ux.intel.com>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
Hui Wang <hui.wang@...onical.com>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski@...ux.intel.com>,
Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] regmap: sdw: move to -EOPNOTSUPP
On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 11:56:01 +0200,
Mark Brown wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 05:08:55PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
> > > > -ENOTSUPP is not a valid error code, use recommended value instead.
>
> > > What makes you say this - it's what regmap uses internally for
> > > unsupported operations?
>
> > This was flagged by scripts/checkpatch.pl (must be a new addition).
>
> checkpatch is broken.
Heh, I'm not objecting it :)
OTOH, it's also true that ENOTSUPP is no good error code if returned
to user-space. Unfortunately many codes (including what I wrote) use
this code mistakenly, and they can't be changed any longer...
Takashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists