[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200826101301.GB4965@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 11:13:01 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
vkoul@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jank@...ence.com,
srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, slawomir.blauciak@...el.com,
Bard liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Rander Wang <rander.wang@...ux.intel.com>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
Hui Wang <hui.wang@...onical.com>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski@...ux.intel.com>,
Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] regmap: sdw: move to -EOPNOTSUPP
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 12:09:28PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:
> > checkpatch is broken.
> Heh, I'm not objecting it :)
> OTOH, it's also true that ENOTSUPP is no good error code if returned
> to user-space. Unfortunately many codes (including what I wrote) use
> this code mistakenly, and they can't be changed any longer...
It's also used internally in various places without being returned to
userspace, that's what's going on here - the regmap core has some
specific checks for -ENOTSUPP.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists