[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200826102545.GF1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 12:25:45 +0200
From: peterz@...radead.org
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: "Eddy_Wu@...ndmicro.com" <Eddy_Wu@...ndmicro.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: x86/kprobes: kretprobe fails to triggered if kprobe at function
entry is not optimized (trigger by int3 breakpoint)
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 07:00:41PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Of course, this doesn't solve the llist_del_first() contention in the
> pre_kretprobe_handler(). So anyway we need a lock for per-probe llist
> (if I understand llist.h comment correctly.)
Bah, lemme think about that. Kprobes really shouldn't be using locks :/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists