linux-kernel - RE: x86/kprobes: kretprobe fails to triggered if kprobe at function entry is not optimized (trigger by int3 breakpoint)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <42c65d9e434945c183ead8bef3d89de2@trendmicro.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Aug 2020 13:36:15 +0000
From:   "Eddy_Wu@...ndmicro.com" <Eddy_Wu@...ndmicro.com>
To:     "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:     "mhiramat@...nel.org" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: x86/kprobes: kretprobe fails to triggered if kprobe at function
 entry is not optimized (trigger by int3 breakpoint)



> -----Original Message-----
> From: peterz@...radead.org <peterz@...radead.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2020 6:26 PM
> To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> Cc: Eddy Wu (RD-TW) <Eddy_Wu@...ndmicro.com>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; x86@...nel.org
> Subject: Re: x86/kprobes: kretprobe fails to triggered if kprobe at function entry is not optimized (trigger by int3 breakpoint)
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 07:00:41PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > Of course, this doesn't solve the llist_del_first() contention in the
> > pre_kretprobe_handler(). So anyway we need a lock for per-probe llist
> > (if I understand llist.h comment correctly.)
>
> Bah, lemme think about that. Kprobes really shouldn't be using locks :/

Maybe we can have per-cpu free list for retprobe_instance?
This ensure we only have one user requesting free instance at a time, given that pre_kretprobe_handler() wont recursive.

We may be wasting memory if target function perfer some cpu though.


TREND MICRO EMAIL NOTICE

The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system.

For details about what personal information we collect and why, please see our Privacy Notice on our website at: Read privacy policy<http://www.trendmicro.com/privacy>