lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 26 Aug 2020 21:11:49 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc:     Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@...il.com>, dennis.dalessandro@...el.com,
        dledford@...hat.com, gustavo@...eddedor.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        mike.marciniszyn@...el.com, roland@...estorage.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] IB/qib: remove superfluous fallthrough statements

On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 02:18:59PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 02:33:27PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 06:12:42PM +0100, Alex Dewar wrote:
> > > Commit 36a8f01cd24b ("IB/qib: Add congestion control agent implementation")
> > > erroneously marked a couple of switch cases as /* FALLTHROUGH */, which
> > > were later converted to fallthrough statements by commit df561f6688fe
> > > ("treewide: Use fallthrough pseudo-keyword"). This triggered a Coverity
> > > warning about unreachable code.
> > >
> > 
> > It's worth mentioning that this warning is triggered only by compilers
> > that don't support __attribute__((__fallthrough__)), which has been
> > supported since GCC 7.1.
> > 
> > > Remove the fallthrough statements.
> > > 
> > > Addresses-Coverity: ("Unreachable code")
> > > Fixes: 36a8f01cd24b ("IB/qib: Add congestion control agent implementation")
> > > Signed-off-by: Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@...il.com>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> > 
> 
> I can take this in my tree for 5.9-rc3.

That would make conflicts for the 2nd patch, lets just send them all
through the rdma tree please. Is there a reason this is -rc material?

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists